Thursday, July 30, 2009

Pet Peeve of the Day

...and today's pet peeve is.....

when people say, "all's I know is..."

The some nice winning grammar. That'll get you far. My boss at my college internship used to say this, and he was actually in a position of power. I think saying "all's" should automatically disqualify someone from being promoted. All's I know is I wouldn't be caught dead giving a promotion to someone who can't speak with slightly better grammar than that.

So let's join together and fight against this one. I do not want it to reach the point where it is so widely used that it becomes acceptable. And I'm afraid that we are headed in that direction.

Save the English language!

This Peeve of the day was inspired by Rocco Mediate who just dropped "all's" in an interview with Mike & Mike.

Movie 159: Fanboys

Fanboys (2008) by Kyle Newman
starring Jay Baruchel, Dan Fogler, Chris Marquette and Sam Huntington


In a nutshell: The enthusiasm for Star Wars shines through, but it's too much of a mess

Quick synopsis: In 1998, 4 friends decide to break into George Lucas's Skywalker Ranch in order to steal a copy of Episode 1 before its release

Content: Fanboys was sitting on the shelf for nearly two years before it finally found its way to a few theaters. This is never a good sign. Fanboys actually had some potential; a pretty good cast, a gigantic group of Star Wars fans that might be interested and a presumably small budget. But something went horribly wrong.

Between the four leading guys, I actually liked three of them. And the one I did not like was Jay Baruchel who I have liked a great deal in other things (Undeclared, Knocked Up). Kristen Bell is also around quite a bit. And the one and only Shooter McGavin (Christopher McDonald) makes a few brief appearences. I have yet to encounter a movie that did not benefit significantly from his larger-than-life presence. But the problem is not with the cast, it's with the screenplay, if there even was one. The story plays out more like a series of sketches more than it does a continuous story. Of the various problems they encouonter during their cross country trip, none are even remotely related to each other, and none of them add anything to the characters or the story. Instead, they serve as short diversions to waste time. Not surprisingly, these diversions are also incrediby generic: an accidental trip into a gay bar that ends with them stripping on stage, a night spent with an old Native American man who slips them some peyote, an evening unwittingly spent with call girls, and, of course, a night in prison.

The rest of the movie serves mostly as a means of giving many former Star Wars legends cameo appearances. In this sense, it's kinda like Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, but not as good. The "story" that gives a few characters motive for wanting to go cross-country is incredibly lame. We are told that one of the 4 guys has cancer and is dying. Then this fact is ignored for the bulk of the film as he runs around with everyone else. I was expecting it to be a ploy of Fogler and Baruchel to reunite the other two characters, who were estranged best friends. But alas, no, he was supposed to actually have cancer. And I think we are supposed to assume that he is dead at the end of the film when the remaining character toast to him, but it's not entirely clear. Studio executives tried to remove the cancer storyline from the film and received backlash from fans demanding that it stay in. So, it was hastily edited back in at the last second, and it shows. They would have better off without it.

A few more bullet points:
  • Baruchel and Bell have one of the least convincing love stories I've ever seen. And they used a horrible cliches to bring them together.
  • The jokes are really not funny
  • Too many of the wacky situations they find themselves in are resolved WAY too easily. They end up in tough spots over-and-over again, only to be released unscathed without decent reasons. This happens about 5 times in Fanboys.
  • The only cameo that I enjoyed was that of a certain former Star Trek captain
  • A pre-famous Seth Rogen plays two roles...neither very well
  • The filmmakers' love for Star Wars did show, unlike the Farrelly Brothers supposed love of the Red Sox in Fever Pitch (see below). Unfortunately, they didn't know how to make a decent film though.
Fanboys suffers from a chronic lack of creativity and originality, and from a sloppy, very poorly tied-together story that feels like it was written in an hour by a sixth grader. Even as a fan of Star Wars, I found the whole thing to be pretty pathetic.

Rolling rankings:
1. Good Will Hunting (#156)
2. In Bruges(#153)
3. The Hangover (#157)
4. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (#155)
5. I.O.U.S.A. (#150)
6. Burn After Reading (#152)
7. The Da Vinci Code (#151)
8. 21 (#154)
9. Fever Pitch (#158)
10. Fanboys (#159)

key:
masterpiece
excellent
good
mixed bag
more bad than good
garbage

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Movie 158: Fever Pitch


Fever Pitch (2005) by the Farrelly Brothers
starring Drew Barrymore and Jimmy Fallon


In a nutshell: There's a reason why Jimmy Fallon hasn't been given any more lead roles

Quick synopsis: The only obstacle to a relationship between a businesswoman and a teacher is his obsession with the Red Sox

Content:
Every formulaic romantic comedy has a gimmick these days. In Little Black Book, it was Carly Simon. In 27 Dresses, it was bridesmaid dresses. And in Fever Pitch, it is my beloved Red Sox. Seeing my Red Sox reduced to this type of gimmick was painful. I really expected more from the Farrelly Brothers, native New Englanders who actually have a reasonable amount of street cred in the Boston sports community thanks to cameos by the likes of Cam Neely and Troy Brown in their films. (Despite his complete lack of acting ability, I will never forget Neely as Sea Bass in Dumb & Dumber). If they had wanted to create a movie that would find a home on the shelves of Sox fans everywhere for decades to come, they should have made a movie that was a love letter to the Red Sox with a romance integrated in. Instead, they did it backwards. They made an incredibly generic romantic comedy and forced the Red Sox into it as the plot device that moves the story forward. But it could have been any type of obsession in their place which is why I really didn't connect at all.

My feelings can be summed up in one scene. Drew accompanies Jimmy to opening day and promptly proceeds to ask the nearby painfully motley crew of fans what the curse of the Bambino is. What happens next turned me off quicker than Nicole Ritchie would. The fans take turns recounting each of the horror stories that befell the Sox through the years (until '04 of course). As soon as one finishes their turn, another jumps annoyingly to take their turn. It almost felt like these people had rehearsed their parts in the tale. Even worse, they do not speak in enough detail for the non-fan to have any clue what they are talking about, but they manage to alienate Sox fans as well, making them feel like they are being patronized. Personally I felt like the filmmakers were just trying to prove themselves to the fans by listing off the history as if they are shouting "Look! we really are big fans! We swear! See? We know about Dent and Buckner and Little..." It drove me nuts. In fact, the way I felt about this scene is representative of my feelings on the movie as a whole: Too esoteric for non-fans, but trying too hard to appeal to actual Sox fans.

On top of the formulaicness (word?) and the annoying script, I also disliked Drew and Jimmy. Jimmy is just a little too awkward to be a leading man. He tries to be funny with his voices and his playfulness, but he isn't. Some of his jokes fall painfully short of their marks. I guess it's no different than his SNL stint. Drew, meanwhile, is doing her schtick that has endeared her to fans for years, talking out the side of her mouth (although I actually liked when Jimmy made fun of her for it) and being a strong woman with a career. Sorry, Drew, but I didn't buy you as a successful businesswoman and I don't care for your entire act as the loveable, modest, and cute-to-a-fault leading lady, although I do have to admit it is well suited to crappy romantic comedies. And I'm not attracted to her whatsoever.

At times, the movie took me for a ride through Hollywood romance cliche hell. The group of Drew's friends were the worst. All stereotyped beyond belief, they meet at the gym and discuss guy things as they work out. Whatever.

Last thing that genuinely pissed me off was the product placement. The idea behind product placement is NOT to make it obvious. But in addition to about 348 Macs appearing throughout the movie, there is one of the most blatant plugs I can remember in a movie. When the kids are touring her office at the beginning of the film, she says something like "oh, here's an example of a project I am working on" as we cut to a shot of her computer screen with a nice, big Marquis Jet logo. They don't even make an effort to work it into the story, they just kind of cut to it in the middle of a scene. Almost felt like a commercial break.

Well, I did give the movie a mixed rating, so that must mean there was something good, right? I liked some of the supporting characters, like that gay guy from Sex and the City. I liked that Lenny Clarke was the uncle. I liked Jimmy's apartment, covered in interesting Sox stuff. I really liked the title cards, done in Red Sox font. The story is at least coherent (as opposed to my next review). And most importantly, I like the theme of coming to the realization that an obsession with something that cannot love you back can be a waste of time. I can relate to this theme, coming to a similar realization about sports. But that doesn't mean they are a complete waste of time either. you just have to find a happy medium, and I think I've reached that point in my own life. I have a feeling that this subject is tackled in a much more sophisticated and interesting manner in the source material, Nick Hornby's book of the same name, but is was done well enough to provoke some thought in the film.

It rubbed a lot of people (myself included) the wrong way, when Jimmy and Drew were in the middle of the actual celebration on the field, recording for the movie, as the Sox won it all in '04. But I think this was mostly only after everyone realized that the movie wasn't very good. If that momentous occasion had been integrated into a movie that seemed more about the Red Sox and less about using the Red Sox, then It could have been something very special.

The most honest moment in the movie? The closing credits which were played over a montage of the victory parade without Jimmy and Drew anywhere to be seen. Instead we watched real fans react to their heroes float by on the duck boats. Watching these thousands of people delirious with joy stirred up stronger emotions in me than any of the other crap strewn about in Fever Pitch.

Rolling rankings:
1. Good Will Hunting (#156)
2. In Bruges(#153)
3. The Hangover (#157)
4. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (#155)
5. Up (#149)
6. I.O.U.S.A. (#150)
7. Burn After Reading (#152)
8. The Da Vinci Code (#151)
9. 21 (#154)
10. Fever Pitch (#158)

key:
masterpiece
excellent
good
mixed bag
more bad than good
garbage